Heroin, Taliban and Pakistan
by B. Raman
The Financial Times (Asian edition)
August 10, 2001
Pakistan's illegal heroin economy has kept its legitimate State economy sustained
since 1990 and prevented its collapse. It has also enabled it to maintain a
high level of arms purchases from abroad and to finance its proxy war against
India through the jehadi organisations.
While no estimate of the money spent by it on its proxy war is available, it
has been estimated by Pakistani analysts ("Friday Times" March 9 to
15, 2001) that about 80 per cent of its total external debt of US $ 38 billion,
that is, about US $30.4 billion, was incurred on arms purchases since 1990.
This includes its purchases of aircraft and missiles from China, missiles from
North Korea, for which payment was made partly in cash and partly in imported
US and Australian wheat, Agosta class submarines from France, reconditioned
Mirage aircraft from France, Lebanon and Australia and other items from countries
such as Ukraine. The clandestine procurement of nuclear technology and material
from Western countries and the Chinese-aided nuclear power station at Chashma
were also financed through external borrowing.
The use of the heroin dollars for such purposes started after the withdrawal
of the Soviet troops from Afghanistan in 1989. In the 1980s, at the insistence
of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the US, the Internal Political Division
of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), headed by Brig (retd). Imtiaz, who
worked directly under Lt.Gen.Hamid Gul, the DG of the ISI during the later years
of Zia-ul-Haq and during the first few months of Mrs. Benazir Bhutto's first
tenure as the Prime Minister (1988-90), started a special cell for the use of
heroin for covert actions.
This cell promoted the cultivation of opium and the extraction of heroin in
Pakistani territory as well as in the Afghan territory under Mujahideen control
for being smuggled into the Soviet controlled areas in order to make the Soviet
troops heroin addicts. After the withdrawal of the Soviet troops, the ISI's
heroin cell started using its network of refineries and smugglers for smuggling
heroin to the Western countries and using the money as a supplement to its legitimate
economy. But for these heroin dollars, Pakistan's legitimate economy must have
collapsed many years ago.
Not only the legitimate State economy, but also many senior officers of the
Army and the ISI benefited from the heroin dollars. Brig.Imtiaz was sacked by
Mrs.Benazir on coming to power in 1988 for interfering in internal politics,
but was reinstated by Mr.Nawaz Sharif on coming to power in 1990 and subsequently
made Director of the Intelligence Bureau (IB).
In fact, in Pakistan, Mr.Sharif is seen as the creation of Brig. Imtiaz. It
was he who, as head of the Internal Political Division of the ISI in the 1980s,
had persuaded Mr.Sharif, then a small businessman in Dubai, to return to Pakistan
and take over the leadership of the Pakistan Muslim League (PML) in order to
counter Mrs.Benazir's Pakistan People's Party (PPP).
Mrs.Benazir again had him sacked on her return to power in 1993 and arrested
and prosecuted him on charges of indulging in illegal activities, but he was
acquitted.
After capturing power on October 12,1999, Gen.Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan's
self-reinstated Chief of the Army Staff (COAS), self-styled Chief Executive
and self-promoted President, had Brig.Imtiaz, because of his proximity to Mr.Sharif,
rearrested and prosecuted for having assets disproportionate to his known sources
of income as an officer of the ISI and the IB.
He was convicted by a court on July 31,2001, and jailed for eight years. According
to evidence produced in the court by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB),
Brig.Imtiaz had foreign exchange bearer certificates worth US $ 20.08 million,
a Pakistani rupee account in the Union Bank with a balance of Rs.2.13 billion,
a US $ account in the Deutsch Bank with a balance of US $ 19.1 million, five
residential houses, five commercial units and three shops. This huge wealth
was allegedly accumulated by him through heroin smuggling.
It is believed that there are at least 30 such Army and ISI officers, serving
and retired, who have accumulated similar wealth through heroin smuggling.
The present estimate of Pakistan's annual earnings through heroin dollars,
including by this writer, is about US $ 1.5 billion. It is difficult to come
across precise, direct evidence for such estimates.
The estimate till now has been based on indirect evidence such as the following:
* The Government of Pakistan releases its foreign exchange reserves position
in two parts. The first part gives the figures of reserves maintained by the
State Bank of Pakistan (SBP). These are the amounts earned through foreign trade,
investment flows, foreign aid and loans and remittances by overseas Pakistanis.
The second part gives the figures of reserves available with other banks. These
are the deposits of resident Pakistanis, who are allowed to maintain dollar
accounts with no questions asked about the origin of the money and about its
liability for income tax. Under Pakistan Government orders, these amounts cannot
be used by the Government for its purposes though Mr. Sharif froze them temporarily
after the Chagai nuclear tests in 1998 in order to be able to use them if the
economic sanctions hit the State economy hard.
* US dollars kept by private citizens in their possession without being deposited
in the banks. The SBP periodically purchases these dollars to meet debt servicing
and other governmental needs.
In any analysis, it would be reasonable to presume that the dollars kept in
the bank accounts of resident Pakistanis and the dollars in private circulation
must have been largely, if not totally, derived from the heroin trade. There
cannot be any other explanation for it because Pakistan has been having a trade
deficit for many years in succession, there has been a 73 per cent decline in
foreign direct investments and a negative flow of portfolio investments and
there was no international assistance forthcoming from October,1999, till November,2000,
when the IMF resumed its stand-by credit facilities to Pakistan.
Quoting SBP sources, the "Business Recorder" of Pakistan (August
1,2001) gave the following figures, which provide a fairly accurate estimate
of the US dollars available in private hands during the financial year 2000-01:
* The SBP had $ 1.7 billion, which was the official foreign exchange reserve
of the State. In addition, resident Pakistanis had deposits in various commercial
banks amounting to US $ 1.5 billion.
* During the financial years 1999-2000 and 2000-01, despite the suspension
of credit facilities by the IMF and other multilateral institutions after the
military coup, the Government fulfilled debt servicing (debt and interest payments)
obligations amounting to US $ 7.8 billion. Out of this, US $ 4 billion came
from the Govt. coffers and the balance of US $ 3.8 billion was purchased from
resident Pakistanis.
In other words, the total amount of US $ in private circulation since the military
regime came to power was almost equal to that in the Govt. coffers, if not more.
The first direct piece of evidence about the total value of the heroin money
being pumped into the Pakistani economy every year has come from an unexpected
source---the Taliban. Before 1998, opium was being grown in the North-West Frontier
Province (NWFP) of Pakistan and in the Nangarhar province in Taliban-controlled
Afghan territory. All the Pakistani-owned refineries for heroin extraction were
located in Taliban-controlled territory.
In 1998-2000, the Pakistani authorities stopped the cultivation of opium in
the NWFP. In 2000-01, the Taliban too, under international pressure, ostensibly
banned opium cultivation in its territory, but did not dismantle the Pakistani-owned
heroin refineries. It demanded that international narcotics control agencies
should reimburse to it the money lost by its farmers due to this ban so that
they can shift to other crops.
US and other foreign narcotics control officials, who visited Nangarhar, confirmed
that opium cultivation has been stopped. However, doubts remain on the following
points:
* Has the Taliban secretly shifted the opium cultivation from the traditional
areas in Nangarhar to which international experts had access to other remote
areas to which they did not have?
* Due to a bumper crop and record heroin production in previous years, the
prices of heroin in the international heroin market had been coming down. Pakistani
smugglers, supported by the ISI, had enough heroin stocks to meet at least two
years' demand of the market. Was the Taliban merely suspending cultivation during
this period to stabilise the prices?
Despite these misgivings, the US announced a contribution of US 1.5 million
to international narcotics control programmes for disbursement to the Afghan
farmers who have stopped poppy cultivation. The Taliban has been describing
this as worse than peanuts and demanding much more.
This was one of the subjects which figured during the discussions of Mrs.Christina
Rocca, US Assistant Secretary of State, with Mullah Abdus Salam Zaeef , the
Taliban Ambassador in Islamabad, and his No. 2, Mr. Sohail Shaheen, at Islamabad
on August 2. According to the "Frontier Post" of Peshawar (August
3,2001), while briefing pressmen after the discussions, a spokesman of the Taliban
said : "We have told the US team that Afghanistan was earning 12 billion
dollars a year from the poppy cultivation and we have eliminated the poppy from
the country."
How much of this amount was going to the Taliban and how much to the Pakistanis
and the ISI, who owned all the refineries? No direct evidence is available,
but one can estimate roughly that out of this at least US $ 11 billion per annum
was going to Pakistan from the following circumstantial evidence:
* There are no reports of large amounts in US dollars circulating in private
hands in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan , whereas Pakistan is awash with them.
* There are no large-scale development and other activities in Afghanistan
which would indicate the availability of large funds in cash. There is so much
poverty due to lack of development that thousands of Afghans have been migrating
to Pakistan.
* Since its capture of Kabul in September,1996, the Taliban had not been publishing
its budget figures. Some details are now available for the first time. According
to these figures, during the financial year 2001-02, the Taliban would have
an estimated expenditure of US $ 82.53 million, of which US $ 43.53 million
is shown as the Discretionary Fund of Mulla Mohammad Omer, the Amir. The balance
is to be spent by various departments. Quoting a study of the New York University
Centre, the "Dawn" of Karachi (June 4,2001) estimates that the Taliban
gets US $ 45 million per annum from the heroin trade, an amount nearly equal
to the Amir's Discretionary Fund.
If this figure of what the Taliban gets is taken as reasonable, more than US
$ 11 billion per annum from the heroin trade goes to Pakistan, that is, more
than Pakistani Rs. 715 billion at one US $ equal to 65 Pak rupees. During 2000-01,
the Pakistani State had a total revenue of Rs.570.6 billion, of which Rs.471.6
billion came from taxes. That is, Pakistan's heroin economy was 30 per cent
larger than its legitimate State economy.
Is it any wonder that its economy does not collapse despite the worst predictions
and that it is able to defy international pressure on its sponsorship of terrorism
against India and on its support to the Taliban and Osama bin Laden?
© Copyright 2001
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has
not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making
such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal
justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted
material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use',
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.