Electromagnetic
Pulse (EMP) Attack Threat Raised in US Senate and Washington Post
"An electromagnetic
pulse (EMP) attack on the American homeland...is one of only a few ways that
the United States could be defeated by its enemies -- terrorist or otherwise.
And it is probably the easiest....Depending on the location and size of the
blast, the effect would be to knock out already stressed power grids and other
electrical systems across much or even all of the continental United States,
for months if not years."
-- US Senator Jon Kyl
in the Washington Post, 4/16/05
Dear friends,
The
below article in the Washington Post is written by US Senator Jon Kyl,
the chairman of the Senate judiciary subcommittee on terrorism, technology
and homeland security. Senator Kyl warns of an EMP (electromagnetic pulse)
attack which could devastate the entire United States. He claims this
extremely debilitating attack could come "not only from terrorist organizations
such as al Qaeda but from rogue nations such as Iran and North Korea."
So
what, or better who, is the real threat here? According to BBC the yearly
military budget for Iran is $7.5 billion, and for Korea is $1.3 billion.
USA Today estimated al
Qaeda's annual budget at a mere $30 million before 9/11, adding that this
has "decreased significantly" since 9/11. So
where are these countries and al Qaeda getting funding for developing and
implementing this sophisticated kind of attack? For comparison, CNN notes
that one B-2 stealth bomber costs $2.2
billion. And though the US budget
for intelligence is classified, the Congressional Budget Office website
states that for "new intelligence-related activities" alone, $20
billion was allocated in 2004, while the US
defense budget is well over $400 billion.
Do
these "rogue states" and terrorist organizations have the budget
and sophistication to produce a devastating electromagnetic attack which could
disable the entire United States? Remember that most of us have never
ever heard of an EMP attack. When we consider the abundant evidence of complicity
in the 9/11 cover-up,
could it be that rogue elements within the shadow government are the ones
actually planning a sophisticated electromagnetic attack to then blame on
others in order to manipulate the public into supporting a war?
There
are certainly precedents for this. Consider Operation
Northwoods, the Pentagon plan to foment terrorism on US soil in the early
1960s in order to provoke the US public into supporting a war against Cuba.
Approved in writing by the Pentagon Joint Chiefs, Operation Northwoods
even proposed blowing up a US ship and hijacking planes as a false pretext
for war. Details of these highly deceptive plans are reported by ABC,
and the declassified Operation Northwoods documents are available for free
viewing on the official website of the US
National Archives and Records Administration.
As
the highly decorated US General Butler stated many years ago in his powerful
book War is a Racket,
war is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, racket around.
Many
citizens and even top government officials have over the years been manipulated
into supporting war to profit certain elite
groups with hidden agendas. Please help work towards a brighter future
and a safer, healthier world by spreading this information to your friends
and colleagues. Take care and have a good day.
With best wishes,
Fred Burks for the WantToKnow.info
Team
Unready
For This Attack
By Jon Kyl
Saturday, April 16, 2005; Page A19
Recently a Senate Judiciary subcommittee of which I am chairman held a hearing
on a major threat to the American people, one that could come not only from
terrorist organizations such as al Qaeda but from rogue nations such as Iran
and North Korea.
An electromagnetic
pulse (EMP) attack on the American homeland, said one of the distinguished scientists
who testified at the hearing, is one of only a few ways that the United States
could be defeated by its enemies -- terrorist or otherwise. And it is probably
the easiest. A single Scud missile, carrying a single nuclear weapon, detonated
at the appropriate altitude, would interact with the Earth's atmosphere, producing
an electromagnetic pulse radiating down to the surface at the speed of light.
Depending on the location and size of the blast, the effect would be to knock
out already stressed power grids and other electrical systems across much or
even all of the continental United States, for months if not years.
Few if any people would die right away. But the loss of power would have a cascading
effect on all aspects of U.S. society. Communication would be largely impossible.
Lack of refrigeration would leave food rotting in warehouses, exacerbated by a
lack of transportation as those vehicles still working simply ran out of gas (which
is pumped with electricity). The inability to sanitize and distribute water would
quickly threaten public health, not to mention the safety of anyone in the path
of the inevitable fires, which would rage unchecked. And as we have seen in areas
of natural and other disasters, such circumstances often result in a fairly rapid
breakdown of social order.
American
society has grown so dependent on computer and other electrical systems that
we have created our own Achilles' heel of vulnerability, ironically much greater
than those of other, less developed nations. When deprived of power, we
are in many ways helpless, as the New York City blackout made clear. In that
case, power was restored quickly because adjacent areas could provide help.
But a large-scale burnout caused by a broad EMP attack would create a much more
difficult situation. Not only would there be nobody nearby to help, it could
take years to replace destroyed equipment.
Transformers for regional substations, for example, are massive pieces of equipment
that are no longer manufactured in the United States and typically take more
than a year to build. In the words of another witness at the hearing, "The
longer the basic outage, the more problematic and uncertain the recovery of
any [infrastructure system] will be. It is possible -- indeed, seemingly likely
-- for sufficiently severe functional outages to become mutually reinforcing,
until a point at which the degradation . . . could have irreversible effects
on the country's ability to support any large fraction of its present human
population." Those who survived, he said, would find themselves transported
back to the United States of the 1880s.
This threat may sound straight out of Hollywood, but it is very real. CIA Director
Porter Goss recently testified before Congress about nuclear material missing
from storage sites in Russia that may have found its way into terrorist hands,
and FBI Director Robert Mueller has confirmed new intelligence that suggests
al Qaeda is trying to acquire and use weapons of mass destruction. Iran has
surprised intelligence analysts by describing the mid-flight detonations of
missiles fired from ships on the Caspian Sea as "successful" tests.
North Korea exports missile technology around the world; Scuds can easily be
purchased on the open market for about $100,000 apiece.
A terrorist organization might have trouble putting a nuclear warhead "on
target" with a Scud, but it would be much easier to simply launch and detonate
in the atmosphere. No need for the risk and difficulty of trying to smuggle
a nuclear weapon over the border or hit a particular city. Just launch a cheap
missile from a freighter in international waters -- al Qaeda is believed to
own about 80 such vessels -- and make sure to get it a few miles in the air.
Fortunately, hardening key infrastructure systems and procuring vital backup
equipment such as transformers is both feasible and -- compared with the threat
-- relatively inexpensive, according to a comprehensive report on the EMP threat
by a commission of prominent experts. But it will take leadership by the Department
of Homeland Security, the Defense Department, and other federal agencies, along
with support from Congress, all of which have yet to materialize.
The Sept. 11 commission report stated that our biggest failure was one of "imagination."
No one imagined that terrorists would do what they did on Sept. 11. Today few
Americans can conceive of the possibility that terrorists could bring our society
to its knees by destroying everything we rely on that runs on electricity. But
this time we've been warned, and we'd better be prepared to respond.
The writer
is a Republican senator from Arizona and chairman of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee
on terrorism, technology and homeland security.
Your tax-deductible donations, however large or small, help greatly to support this important work. To make a donation by credit card, check, or money order:
http://www.WantToKnow.info/donationswtk
Explore these empowering websites coordinated by the nonprofit PEERS network:
http://www.momentoflove.org
- Every person in the world has a heart
http://www.WantToKnow.info
- Reliable, verifiable information on major cover-ups
http://www.inspiringcommunity.org
- Building a Global Community for All
http://www.weboflove.org
- Strengthening the Web of Love that interconnects us all
http://www.transformationteam.net - The Transformation Team: Conscious community in action
Educational websites promoting transformation through information and inspiration
Electromagnetic
Pulse Attack
|