New cell
phone technology allows call from flights?
What
about all those 9/11 calls?
”Once you get to a certain height, you are no longer in the range of
the cellular network, because cell phone towers aren't built to project their
signals that high.”
Washington
Post, 12/9/04
“Today's vote by the FCC is intended to address whether technology has
improved to the extent that cell phone calls now are possible above 10,000 feet
-- they weren't in the past.”
San
Francisco Chronicle, 12/15/04
Dear
friends,
Below
is a very interesting article in USA Today about new technology
enabling cell phone use on airplanes. We all know that you need to be within
range of a cell phone tower in order to make cell phone calls. The new
technology reported below sets up a beacon on planes allowing the use of
cell phones. Yet, it is most interesting that all of the newspapers at the
time of 9/11 reported multiple cell phone calls from the hijacked planes
which could not have been within reach of a cell phone
tower. Particularly on Flight 93, which crashed in the countryside of
Pennsylvania, numerous calls were reported to have been made using
cell phones, with at least one being a 30-minute call. How is this
possible?
Note
the claim towards the end of the article: "It was widely known that cell
phones will sometimes work on jetliners. Some travelers use them
surreptitiously. On Sept. 11, 2001, several passengers aboard hijacked
airliners called loved ones." As far as I can tell, this is not at all a
widely known fact. In my work as an interpreter, I have at
times flown over 50,000 miles a year, yet have never seen or
heard of someone making a cell phone call from a plane. Have any of you ever
heard of this? Another unanswered question about 9/11. Please help spread the
news.
With
best wishes,
Fred
Note: To find articles
showing multiple cell phone use on Sept. 11, 2001, type
"9/11" and "cell phone calls" into your favorite
search engine, or see http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A14344-2001Sep11?language=printer [30-minute
call] and http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11/911.call/
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/wireless/2004-07-16-jet-phones_x.htm
Cell phones test
positive on AA flight
FORT WORTH (AP) — With television cameramen hovering, Qualcomm chief
executive Irwin Jacobs sat in the front row of coach and made one of the
first legal cell phone calls from a commercial jetliner. After chatting with
a telecom industry lobbyist for a few minutes, Jacobs pronounced the
technology behind the airborne phone call a success, although adding that it
will be improved over the next couple years.
Jacobs and a group of reporters were aboard an American
Airlines jetliner Thursday as it took off from Dallas-Fort Worth
International Airport for a demonstration of Qualcomm's cellular technology
at 25,000 feet.
The flight required special clearance from the Federal
Aviation Administration and Federal Communications Commission, which ban the
use of electronic devices abroad planes because of fear they would interfere
with navigation systems and cellular networks on the ground.
"It's pretty cool," said Monte Ford, American's
top technology official.
Ford said he called his wife, secretary and friends in
Paris and Madrid and pronounced the quality of the links good, although he
acknowledged the international connections weren't quite as good as domestic
ones.
Reporters were given phones with code division multiple
access, or CDMA technology, and a few minutes to make and receive calls.
Qualcomm commercialized the CDMA technology used in wireless network
equipment and licenses system software to cell phone makers.
Connections from the plane were generally good, although
some calls were dropped. Sound quality was about the same as a regular cell
call on the ground, other than the loud background noise on the MD-80 jet.
There was a delay of about one second in the voice
communications, like that encountered when using a satellite phone, which
interfered with natural conversation. The delay was caused by the way voices
are digitally transmitted in so-called packets from the airplane to the
ground.
Also, the caller could not hear the phone ringing on the
other end, which caused at least one reporter to hang up while the person on
the other end was shouting into the receiver.
Jacobs said San Diego-based Qualcomm would spend the next
two years testing whether electronic signals interfered with the jet's
avionics system. He also said the technology would be improved and the
one-second delay would be shortened.
Eventually, air travelers should be able to make calls,
download movies and do all sorts of other things with wireless devices aboard
jetliners, he said.
"My guess is we will see the same kind of uses that
you have with cell phones on the ground — maybe even more because you're
confined to a seat for some time in a plane," Jacobs said.
The cooperation between Qualcomm and American is not
exclusive. Qualcomm is talking to other carriers around the world about
testing CDMA phones on their jets, and American may talk to other
telecommunications companies, officials said.
Qualcomm's CDMA technology is one of a few standards used
worldwide to convert voice into digital form for transmission over a wireless
network.
American would have an important advantage over
competitors if it could become the first U.S. carrier to allow cell phone use
on most of its planes, Ford said.
Several years ago, American installed seatback phones,
which could be used with a credit card, on many of its planes but ripped them
out except in some Boeing 777s and 767s on international routes.
"People found those phones expensive to use and not
necessarily convenient," Ford said. "They waited to get on the
ground to make calls with their cell phones."
The seatback phones use FAA-approved technology that
doesn't interfere with jet navigation systems. Airlines generally charge
about $4 a minute plus a $4 access charge.
Even before Thursday it was widely known that cell phones
will sometimes work on jetliners. Some travelers use them surreptitiously. On
Sept. 11, 2001, several passengers aboard hijacked airliners called loved
ones.
However, the FAA and the airlines ban them because they
fear that the signals could interfere with navigational equipment. The FCC
bans their use from planes because the signals reach many cell-phone towers
and have been shown to disrupt cellular networks.
A nonprofit aeronautics group, RTCA Inc., is working on
recommendations to the FAA on guidelines for testing wireless devices.
-- To subscribe to or unsubscribe from the WantToKnow.info list (one email every few days):
http://www.WantToKnow.info/subscribe --