As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, we depend almost entirely on grassroots donations. Please consider making a donation.
Subscribe here and join over 13,000 subscribers to our free weekly newsletter

Rand Paul on Fauci diary entries: ‘Level of dishonesty is really astounding’
Key Excerpts from Article on Website of The Hill

Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voted to hold Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress. Photo: AP Photo/Allison Robbert

The Hill, July 28, 2026
Posted: August 6th, 2026
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5993885-rand-paul-accuse...

Senate Homeland Security Committee Chair Rand Paul, who has published Dr. Anthony Fauci’s private diary from when he led the nation’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, says that the entries reveal a “level of dishonesty” that is “really astounding.” “One of the biggest items that we found in there was that in January of 2020 he already was acknowledging that the virus didn’t originate in the marketplace. For years he’s been telling you — if you interviewed him last week, he’s probably still telling you — the reason we think it came from nature is because they had these exotic animals and that’s where SARS came from previously,” Paul told reporters. “The earliest people who got COVID were not associated with the marketplace. The Chinese CDC was saying this in January of 2020. He knew it, he told dear diary, but to the public, he commissioned this paper called ‘Proximal Origins,’ and in it they go on and on saying it’s implausible that it came from the lab and we’re really convinced it came from these wild animals in the marketplace,” Paul told reporters. Paul has accused Fauci of lying about gain-of-function research into dangerous viruses at the Chinese lab and subpoenaed the 85-year-old former health official to testify before his committee. Paul also said on social media that his investigation into Fauci shows that he “put protecting his reputation ahead of protecting the American people.”

Note: As Washington Post reported, Fauci characterized the 6-ft recommendation as “an empiric decision that wasn’t based on data” and testified: “It sort of just appeared, that six feet is going to be the distance.” In our latest Substack, COVID Revisited: A Complete Guide to Pandemic Propaganda and the Search for Truth in a Divided World, we explore how many COVID-era policies and mandates didn’t actually have a scientific basis, and failed to hold up in the face of real world evidence. We also emphasize the devastating public health costs of fear, division, and social isolation. Read more on how Fauci was "untruthful" to Congress about Wuhan lab virus research.


Latest News


Key News Articles from Years Past