Related Stories
Can You Count on Voting Machines?
Key Excerpts from Article on Website of New York Times
Posted: January 13th, 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/magazine/06Vote-t.html
In the last three election cycles, touch-screen machines have become one of the most mysterious and divisive elements in modern electoral politics. In hundreds of instances ... they [have failed] unpredictably, and in extremely strange ways; voters report that their choices flip from one candidate to another before their eyes; machines crash or begin to count backward; votes simply vanish. Most famously, in the November 2006 Congressional election in Sarasota, Fla., touch-screen machines recorded an 18,000-person undervote for a race decided by fewer than 400 votes. The earliest critiques of digital voting booths came from the fringe disgruntled citizens and ... computer geeks but the fears have now risen to the highest levels of government. One by one, states are renouncing the use of touch-screen voting machines. California and Florida decided to get rid of their electronic voting machines last spring, and last month, Colorado decertified about half of its touch-screen devices. Also last month, Jennifer Brunner, the Ohio secretary of state, released a report in the wake of the Cuyahoga crashes arguing that touch-screens may jeopardize the integrity of the voting process. She was so worried she is now forcing Cuyahoga to scrap its touch-screen machines and go back to paper-based voting before the Ohio primary, scheduled for March 4. Michael Shamos, a computer scientist at Carnegie Mellon University who has examined voting-machine systems for more than 25 years, estimates that about 10 percent of the touch-screen machines fail in each election.
Note: 10% of the machines fail, yet many still believe the results from previous elections were accurate. For many revealing reports on the serious problems with electronic voting machines, click here.
Related Stories
Latest News
Key News Articles from Years Past
