9/11 News Stories Excerpts of Key 9/11 News Stories in Major Media
Below are many highly revealing excerpts of important 9/11 news stories reported in the major media. Links are provided to the full stories on major media websites. If any link should fail to function, click here. These 9/11 news stories are listed by date posted here. For the same list by order of importance click here. For the list by date of news story, click here. By choosing to educate ourselves on these important issues and to spread the word, we can and will build a brighter future.
Note: For an index to revealing excerpts of news stories on several dozen engaging topics, click here.
The war on paperclips 2005-05-11, The Guardian (One of the U.K.'s leading newspapers) Posted: 2006-12-07 15:38:31 http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1480940,00.html The FBI, as
we know, blocked all manner of investigations into the [9/11] plot in the
run up to its execution, whether these involved highly specific warnings from
its own agents or from government sources in Afghanistan, Argentina, Britain,
the Cayman Islands, Egypt, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Morocco
and Russia. Meanwhile, I worry why the nearest military
aircraft weren't scrambled to intercept any of the hijacked flights when
this is standard procedure and why, when more distant jets were finally aloft,
they flew at less
than half speed, thus failing to prevent the impacts at the twin towers.
Court Dismisses FBI Contractor's Suit Against U.S. 2005-05-07, Washington Post Posted: 2006-12-07 15:36:49 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/06/AR20050506018... A federal appeals
court rejected a fired FBI contractor's bid to revive her lawsuit against
the government. Sibel Edmonds said she was fired from her job as a wiretap
translator because she told superiors she suspected that a co-worker was leaking
information to targets of an ongoing FBI investigation. The FBI said it fired
her because she committed security violations and disrupted the office. The
Justice Department's inspector general said Edmonds's allegations about a
coworker "raised serious concerns that, if true, could potentially have
extremely damaging consequences for the FBI."
Note:
This article doesn't even mention 9/11, yet Ms. Edmonds has stated publicly
that her testimony would put top government officials behind bars for their
role in blocking information which could have stopped the 9/11 attacks. For
more eye-opening information, click here
and here.
Read Ms. Edmond's open letter to the chairman of the 9/11 Commission to find out what key people in government don't want you to know about her testimony. See also her excellent website http://www.justacitizen.com
She was also instrumental in forming a National Security Whistleblowers
Coalition.
FBI to Fire Dissident Agent 2005-04-23, Washington Post Posted: 2006-12-07 15:32:18 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10381-2005Apr22.html The FBI
has moved to fire a veteran agent who alleged that the bureau had mishandled
domestic investigations. On Thursday, Robert Wright was ordered by superiors
at an FBI counterterrorism command office in Washington to hand over his badge
and weapon, was suspended and was told he would be fired within 30 days, said
an official with Judicial Watch, a government watchdog group whose attorneys
represent Wright. Wright was told he was being dismissed for, among other
things, publicly discussing sensitive FBI matters in 2003, the official said.
Wright has been under disciplinary investigation for almost three years. He
has two lawsuits pending against the FBI. Yesterday, Sens. Charles E. Grassley
(R-Iowa) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) sent FBI Director Robert S. Mueller
III a letter repeating their support for Wright and expressing concern that
the FBI was retaliating against him for his public statements.
Note: What
the Post article completely fails to mention is that Robert Wright
was hot on the trail of key terrorists before 9/11, yet he was ordered
to stop the investigation by his FBI supervisors. For past media stories on this with links to original sources, click here, here, and here. Mr. Wright is one of the FBI agents who
approached renowned attorney David Schippers just weeks before 9/11 to warn
that a major terrorist attack was going to take place in lower Manhattan.
For more, click
here.
Court prevents release of most September 11 emergency calls 2005-03-24, CNN News Posted: 2006-12-07 15:28:31 http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/24/sept11.tapes The emergency
phone calls made by people trapped inside the World Trade Center on September
11, 2001, need not be released to the public, a New York court ruled Thursday.
The families sought release of the 9-1-1 calls possessed by the Fire Department
of New York, along with department dispatcher calls and interviews with
firefighters who participated in the September 11 rescue effort. The FDNY
had resisted the disclosures, citing privacy concerns. The FDNY also sought
to block the release of six unidentified tapes and transcripts selected by
federal prosecutors as evidence in the prosecution of Zacarias Moussaoui,
the only person facing trial in the United States for the September 11 attacks.
Judge in Moussaoui Case Blocks Release of Sept. 11 Report 2005-04-30, Washington Post Posted: 2006-12-07 15:26:36 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/29/AR20050429014... The federal
judge overseeing the prosecution of admitted al Qaeda operative Zacarias Moussaoui
has blocked an attempt by the Justice Department's inspector general to release
a report on FBI missteps prior to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, according to
a ruling unsealed yesterday. Without explanation, U.S. District Judge Leonie
M. Brinkema denied the request by Inspector General Glenn A. Fine, who completed
the report last July but since has been unable to get permission to provide
an unclassified version of the document to the public. The report, titled
"A Review of the FBI's Handling of Intelligence Information Related to
the September 11 Attacks," provides an in-depth examination of three
episodes considered potential missed opportunities to detect the Sept. 11
plot, including Moussaoui's arrest in August 2001.
Note:
Moussaoui is one of only two people ever to be charged with direct involvement in 9/11. For more key info on Moussaoui, click here. According to the Senate
Intelligence Committee, on Aug. 27, 2001, an FBI agent was trying to make
sure that Moussaoui did "not take control of a plane and fly it into
the World Trade Center." Why have we not heard more about all this?
UPI Hears... 2005-06-13, Washington Times/United Press International Posted: 2006-12-07 15:20:12 http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said, "If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling." Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."
Note: If the above link fails, click here. Why wasn't this widely reported? For 50 other senior government officials who have seriously questioned the 9/11 Commission Report, click here.
Federal agency planned plane-crashing-into-building drill [on] Sept. 11 2002-08-22, USA Today/Associated Press Posted: 2006-12-05 23:31:10 http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002-08-22-sept-11-plane-drill-_x.htm In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism — it was to be a simulated accident. Officials at the Chantilly, Va.-based National Reconnaissance Office had scheduled an exercise that morning in which a small corporate jet would crash into one of the four towers at the agency's headquarters building. The agency is about four miles from the runways of Washington Dulles International Airport. "It was just an incredible coincidence that this happened to involve an aircraft crashing into our facility," [NRO spokesman Art] Haubold said. "As soon as the real world events began, we canceled the exercise." Adding to the coincidence, American Airlines Flight 77 — the Boeing 767 that was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon — took off from Dulles at 8:10 a.m. on Sept. 11, 50 minutes before the exercise was to begin. It struck the Pentagon around 9:40 a.m., killing 64 aboard the plane and 125 on the ground. The National Reconnaissance Office operates many of the nation's spy satellites. It draws its personnel from the military and the CIA. In a promotion for speaker John Fulton, a CIA officer assigned as chief of NRO's strategic gaming division, the announcement says, "On the morning of September 11th 2001, Mr. Fulton and his team ... were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building."
Note: For many more disturbing coincindences and outright cover-ups around 9/11, click here. And for yet another amazing "coincidence" surrounding the London bombings, click here.
Former Scotland Yard Official Peter Power on London Bombings 2005-07-07, Global Research/BBC Radio Posted: 2006-12-05 23:14:21 http://globalresearch.ca/audiovideo/070705londonterrorexercise.mp3 POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now. HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this, and it happened while you were running the exercise? POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning. We planned this for a company, and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met. And so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one, and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking.
Note: For Mr. Power's comments on CBC radio, Canada's PBS, click here. For many more serious questions raised around the London bombings, click here and here. For a very similar "coincidence" on 9/11, click here.
The Secret Government: The Constitution in Crisis 1987-11-04, WantToKnow.info/PBS Documentary Posted: 2006-12-01 20:58:34 http://www.WantToKnow.info/050423secretgovernment The Secret Government is an interlocking network of official functionaries, spies, mercenaries, ex-generals, profiteers and superpatriots, who, for a variety of motives, operate outside the legitimate institutions of government. The Russians had been our ally against the Nazis, an expedient alliance for the sake of war. Now they were our enemy. To fight them we turned to some of the very men who had inflicted on humanity the horrors of Hitler’s madness. We hired Nazis’ as American spies. Admiral Gene La Rocque: “That National Security Act of 1947 changed dramatically the direction of this great nation. It established the framework for a national security state. Never have we had a National Security Council so concerned about the nation’s security that we’re always looking for threats and looking how to orchestrate our society to oppose those threats. National Security was invented, almost, in 1947, and now it has become the prime mover of everything we do. The National Security Act also gave us the Central Intelligence Agency." In 1975 ... Congress took its first public look at the Secret Government. Senator Frank Church chaired the Select Committee to study government operations. The hearings opened the books on a string of lethal activities. From the use of electric pistols and poison pellets, to Mafia connections and drug experiments. And they gave us a detailed account of assassination plots against foreign leaders and the overthrowing of sovereign governments. This is a system easily corrupted. While freedom does have enemies in the world, it can also be undermined here at home, in the dark, by those posing as its friends.
Note: This highly revealing PBS documentary is available for free viewing on the Internet. For the link, written text, and much more on this amazingly revealing documentary, click here.
Is Al Qaeda Just a Bush Boogeyman? 2005-01-11, Los Angeles Times Posted: 2006-12-01 20:30:58 http://articles.latimes.com/2005/jan/11/opinion/oe-scheer11 Is it conceivable that Al Qaeda, as defined by President Bush as the center of a vast and well-organized international terrorist conspiracy, does not exist? To even raise the question amid all the officially inspired hysteria is heretical. Yet a brilliant new BBC film produced by one of Britain's leading documentary filmmakers systematically challenges this. "The Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics of Fear" ... argues coherently that much of what we have been told about the threat of international terrorism "is a fantasy that has been exaggerated and distorted by politicians. It is a dark illusion that has spread unquestioned ... around the world." Why have we heard so much frightening talk about "dirty bombs" when experts say it is panic rather than radioactivity that would kill people? Why did Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld claim on "Meet the Press" in 2001 that Al Qaeda controlled massive high-tech cave complexes in Afghanistan, when British and U.S. military forces later found no such thing? The film ... directly challenges the conventional wisdom by making a powerful case that the Bush administration, led by a tight-knit cabal of Machiavellian neoconservatives, has seized upon the false image of a unified international terrorist threat to replace the expired Soviet empire in order to push a political agenda. "The nightmare vision of a uniquely powerful hidden organization waiting to strike our societies is an illusion. Wherever one looks for this Al Qaeda organization, from the mountains of Afghanistan to the 'sleeper cells' in America, the British and Americans are chasing a phantom enemy."
Note: If above link fails, click here. This highly revealing film by one of Britain's most respected documentary makers is available for free viewing on the Internet. For the link and lots more on this amazingly revealing documentary, click here. For an excellent review of the film in one of the U.K.'s leading newspapers, click here.
Ex-employee says FAA warned before 9/11 2006-11-24, USA Today Posted: 2006-11-26 13:37:07 http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-11-23-whistle-blower-faa_x.htm From 1995 to 2001, Bogdan Dzakovic served as a team leader on the Federal Aviation Administration's Red Team. Set up by Congress to help the FAA ... the elite squad tested airport security systems. In the years leading up to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Dzakovic says, the team was able to breach security about 90% of the time, sneaking bombs and submachine guns past airport screeners. Expensive new bomb detection machines consistently failed. The team repeatedly warned the FAA of the potential for security breaches and hijackings but was told to cover up its findings. Eventually, the FAA began notifying airports in advance when the Red Team would be doing its undercover testing. He and other Red Team members approached the Department of Transportation's Office of the Inspector General, the General Accounting Office and members of Congress about the FAA's alleged misconduct. No one did anything. "Immediately (after 9/11), numerous government officials from FAA as well as other government agencies made defensive statements such as, 'How could we have known this was going to happen?' " Dzakovic testified later before the 9/11 Commission. After filing [a] complaint, Dzakovic was removed from his Red Team leadership position. He now works for the Transportation Security Administration. His primary assignments include tasks such as hole-punching, updating agency phonebooks and "thumb-twiddling." At least he hasn't received a pay cut, he says. He makes about $110,000 a year for what he describes as "entry-level idiot work."
'State secrets privilege' blocks fired translator from suing FBI 2006-11-24, USA Today Posted: 2006-11-26 13:35:41 http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-11-23-whistleblower-translator_x... Sibel Edmonds, who formed the 100-plus member National Security whistle-blowers Coalition in 2002, began working as a linguist for the FBI the week after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack. Several months into her contract, she discovered "shoddy" translations relevant to 9/11 created by translators who had "failed the proficiency exams." Edmonds says the translator was sent to Guantanamo Bay to translate "the most sensitive terrorist-related information" from interviews of detainees. Edmonds also notified her superiors that a co-worker was responsible for translating wiretaps of a company the latter used to work for. [Edmonds] was fired in March 2002. When Edmonds asked why, she received a letter saying her contract had been "terminated completely for the government's convenience." In its final report, the inspector general concluded that "we believe that many of (Edmonds') allegations were supported, that the FBI did not take them seriously enough, and that her allegations were, in fact, the most significant factor in the FBI's decision to terminate her services." The same month the report was released, Edmonds' lawsuit to contest her firing was dismissed. Legal briefs show the government had invoked the so-called state secrets privilege, arguing that the lawsuit would jeopardize national security. "Instead of protecting and standing up for whistle-blowers, this is just giving the complete green light to retaliate," says Edmonds, who lost her appeal.
Note: This article fails to mention that Edmonds has repeatedly stated in public forums and in the press that she has specific information on the involvement of certain high officials in 9/11. For more on this vital topic, click here.
Able Danger disabled 2005-08-13, Toledo Blade Posted: 2006-11-24 00:00:49 http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050813/COLUMNIST14/508130... What may be
a bigger scandal is that the staff of the 9/11 Commission knew of Able Danger
and what it had found, but made no mention of it in its report. This is as
if the commission that investigated the attack on Pearl Harbor had written
its final report without mentioning the Japanese. Mr. Weldon unveiled Able
Danger in a speech on the House floor June 27, but his remarks didn't attract
attention until the New York Times reported on them Tuesday. When the story
broke, former Rep. Lee Hamilton, a Democrat from Indiana, co-chairman of the
9/11 Commission, at first denied the commission had ever been informed of
what Able Danger had found, and took a swipe at Mr. Weldon's credibility:
"The Sept. 11th Commission did not learn of any U.S. government knowledge
prior to 9/11 of the surveillance of Mohammed Atta or his cell," Mr.
Hamilton said. "Had we learned of it obviously it would have been a major
focus of our investigation." Mr. Hamilton changed his tune after the
New York Times reported Thursday, and the Associated Press confirmed, that
commission staff had been briefed on Able Danger in October, 2003, and again
in July, 2004. The 9/11 commission wrote history as it wanted it to be, not
as it was. The real history of what happened that terrible September day has
yet to be written.
An Inconvenient Patriot 2005-09-00, Vanity Fair September 2005 Issue Posted: 2006-11-23 23:56:33 http://www.WantToKnow.info/sibeledmondsvanityfair Love of country
led Sibel Edmonds to become a translator for the F.B.I. following 9/11. But
everything changed when she accused a colleague of covering up illicit activity
involving Turkish nationals. Fired after sounding the alarm, she's now fighting
for the ideals that made her an American, and threatening some very powerful
people. Edmonds has given confidential testimony inside a secure Sensitive
Compartmented Information facility on several occasions: to congressional
staffers, to investigators from the O.I.G., and to the staff from the 9/11
commission. Sources familiar with this testimony say that, in addition
to her allegations about the Dickersons, she reported hearing Turkish wiretap
targets boast that they had a covert relationship with a very senior politician
indeed – Dennis Hastert, Republican congressman from Illinois and Speaker
of the House since 1999. The targets reportedly discussed giving Hastert
tens of thousands of dollars in surreptitious payments in exchange for political
favors and information. "The Dickersons," says one official familiar
with the case, "are only the tip of the iceberg."
Note:
Sibel Edmonds is a courageous FBI whistleblower who is one of the great heroes
of the 9/11 movement. For more mainstream media reports on her case with links
to original sources provided, click here
and here.
For a nationally broadcast August 10th radio interview (written transcript
provided) of Ms. Edmonds describing her case, click
here. For an article on her own website describing how the FBI had clear
foreknowledge of 9/11, see http://justacitizen.com/articles_documents/FBI%20&%20911.htm
McKinney reopens 9/11 2005-07-23, Atlanta Journal-Constitution (Atlanta's leading newspaper) Posted: 2006-11-23 23:56:05 http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/stories/0705/23natmckinney.html Rep. Cynthia
McKinney led a Capitol Hill hearing Friday on whether the Bush administration
was involved in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. "What we are
doing is asking the unanswered questions of the 9/11 families," McKinney,
a DeKalb County Democrat...said during the proceedings. The eight-hour
hearing, timed to mark the first anniversary of the release of the Sept. 11
commission's report on the attacks, drew dozens of contrarians and conspiracy
theorists who suggest President Bush purposely ignored warnings or may even
have had a hand in the attack — claims participants said the commission ignored.
"Congresswoman McKinney is viewed as a contrarian," panelist Melvin
Goodman, a former CIA official, said. "And I hope someday her views will
be considered conventional wisdom."
Note:
Other than this article and C-SPAN (see below), no major media covered this
important event. C-SPAN 2 eventually aired the hearing on August 31, 2005 at 8 PM. Many thanks to C-SPAN for being the only media
outlet that consistently reports on 9/11 information that should be making
headlines in all major media.
9/11 on Trial 2005-08-06, Daily Mail (Second largest circulation English-language newspaper in the world) Posted: 2006-11-23 23:43:32 http://www.WantToKnow.info/911dailymailarticle Towers that
fell ‘like a controlled demolition’. Planes that vanished then mysteriously
reappeared, And crucial evidence that has been lost for ever. A new book raises
bizarre yet deeply unsettling questions about the world’s worst terror atrocity.
Henshall and Morgan say the...call for transparency is the thrust of their whole argument. It is time, they say, for a full and truly independent inquiry into 9/11 that will reveal all the facts and silence the rumours. With public trust one of the major casualties of the war, can any of us be absolutely sure we have not been caught up in a lie and perhaps a bigger one even than we ever though possible?
Note:
This is one of the longest, most thorough articles on 9/11 cover-ups in the mainstream
media yet to be published. Click on the link above to read the full article. To
give an idea of the contents, here are the section titles of this eye-opening
article:
- Did the CIA
actively help the hijackers?
- ‘The fire wasn’t hot enough to cause a collapse'
- One expert said there were bombs inside the towers
- Why didn't fighter planes intercept the hijackers?
- The hole in the Pentagon was too small for a Boeing
- The air force scrambled from the wrong base
- So how did the passengers make those phone calls?
Getting Agnostic About 9/11 2005-08-28, Los Angeles Times Posted: 2006-11-22 22:02:05 http://www.latimes.com/features/printedition/magazine/la-tm-crgriffin35aug28,... Anyone who types the words "9/11" and "conspiracy" into an online search engine soon learns that not everybody buys the official narrative of what took place on Sept. 11, 2001. As a professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology, 66-year-old David Ray Griffin would seem to have more affinity for leather elbow patches than tin hats, yet after friends and colleagues prodded him into sifting through the evidence, he experienced a conversion. "For the first year and a half I just accepted the conventional view ... that this was blowback for our foreign policy. When a colleague suggested to me ... forces within our own government had arranged it, I didn't accept that. Then several months later another colleague sent me a website that had a timeline. Once I ... saw all those stories drawn from mainstream sources that contradicted the official account, I decided I needed to look into it more carefully, and the more I looked, the worse it got. The fact that Building 7 ... collapsed when it had not been hit by an airplane ... that's a smoking gun. The fact that standard operating procedures were not followed that morning, and we've gotten three different stories now by the U.S. military as to why they did not intercept the planes, that's a smoking gun. The 9/11 commission simply ignored those questions. The official account itself is a conspiracy theory. It says that 19 Arab Muslims...conspired to pull off this operation. The question is not whether one is a conspiracy theorist about 9/11. It's which conspiracy theory do you find most supported by the evidence?"
Note: If the Los Angeles Times link does not work, click here for the full article. The timeline to which Prof. Griffin refers is the WantToKnow.info timeline at http://www.WantToKnow.info/9-11cover-up
500 Conspiracy Buffs Meet to Seek the Truth of 9/11 2006-06-05, New York Times Posted: 2006-11-22 19:00:58 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/05/us/05conspiracy.html?ex=1307160000&en=2d326... In the ballroom foyer of the Embassy Suites Hotel, the two-day International Education and Strategy Conference for 9/11 Truth was off to a rollicking start. More than 500 people — from Italy to Northern California — gathered for the weekend at a major chain hotel near the runways of O'Hare International. There were talks on the Reichstag fire and the sinking of the Battleship Maine as precedents for 9/11. There were speeches by the lawyer for James Earl Ray, who claimed that a military conspiracy killed the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, and by a former operative for the British secret service, MI5. 9/11 Truthers [are] a group that, in its rank and file, includes professors, chain-saw operators, mothers, engineers, activists, used-book sellers, pizza deliverymen, [and] college students. Steven E. Jones [is] a professor of physics at Brigham Young University and the movement's expert in the matter of collapse. Dr. Jones...is a soft-spoken man who lets his writing do the talking. He composed an account of the destruction of the towers...that holds that "pre-positioned cutter-charges" brought the buildings down. There is a plan by the British delegation...to get members of Parliament to watch "Loose Change," the seminal movement DVD. The Truthers are not alone in believing the whole truth has not come out. A poll released last month by Zogby International found that 42 percent of all Americans believe the 9/11 Commission "concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence" in the attacks. [And a] Zogby poll two years ago that found that 49 percent of New York City residents agreed with the idea that some leaders "knew in advance" that the attacks were planned and failed to act.
Click Here for Conspiracy 2006-08-00, Vanity Fair August 2006 Issue Posted: 2006-11-22 18:42:58 http://www.vanityfair.com/commentary/content/articles/060717roco02 Nine-eleven conspiracy theories have been circulating for years, producing millions of Web links, scores of books, and a nationwide collection of doubters known as the "9/11 Truth" movement. For those who can't find information about the alleged cover-up on the nightly news, there is Loose Change, a documentary about 9/11. Since it appeared on the Web in April 2005, the 80-minute film has been climbing up and down Google Video's "Top 100," rising to No. 1 this May, with at least 10 million viewings. It's safe to say that, if it were a theatrical release, Loose Change would be one of the most popular—and incendiary—movies in the country right now. Most of what we see on-screen during Loose Change are actually news reports from mainstream-media outlets like CBS News, Newsweek, CNN, the Associated Press, even Fox News. Loose Change is an investigation into the official story of 9/11 as told by The 9/11 Commission Report. Why were the black boxes from American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 never found, when the passport of one of Flight 11's alleged hijackers, Satam Al Suqami, turned up unscathed a few blocks from the World Trade Center? Hani Hanjour, one of the alleged hijackers of American Airlines Flight 77, had trouble controlling and landing a single-engine Cessna 172 when he did test runs. Yet according to the official version of events, if Hani Hanjour had been the pilot he would have had to execute a perfect 330-degree turn at 530 miles per hour, descending 7,000 feet in two and a half minutes, in order to crash Flight 77, a Boeing 757, into the Pentagon.
Note: To watch this incredibly revealing documentary free online, click here.
Senior Government Officials Question 9/11 Commission Report 2006-09-11, Boston Globe/Fox News/Wall Street Journal, More Posted: 2006-11-22 16:46:31 http://www.WantToKnow.info/officialsquestion911commissionreport Many respected senior members of the U.S. military, intelligence services, and government have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report. Some even allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11. Below are the highly revealing statements on this vital topic of over 50 prominent public servants with links for verification and further investigation. The collective voices of these respected senior officials give credibility to the claim that the 9/11 Commission Report is tragically flawed. These dedicated individuals from both political parties cannot be simply dismissed as irresponsible believers in some 9/11 conspiracy theory. Their sincere concern, backed by decades of service to their country, demonstrate that criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report is not only reasonable and responsible, it is in fact a patriotic duty.
Key 9/11 News Stories in Major Media
|