Related Stories
Adequacy of gross domestic product indicator under evaluation
Key Excerpts from Article on Website of New York Times
Posted: February 7th, 2011
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/magazine/16GDP-t.html
G.D.P. is an index of a countrys entire economic output a tally of, among many other things, manufacturers shipments, farmers harvests, retail sales and construction spending. Its a figure that compresses the immensity of a national economy into a single data point of surpassing density. The conventional feeling about G.D.P. is that the more it grows, the better a country and its citizens are doing. [But] it has been a difficult few years for G.D.P. For decades, academics and gadflies have been critical of the measure, suggesting that it is an inaccurate and misleading gauge of prosperity. What has changed more recently is that G.D.P. has been actively challenged by a variety of world leaders, especially in Europe, as well as by a number of international groups, like the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The G.D.P. ... has not only failed to capture the well-being of a 21st-century society but has also skewed global political objectives toward the single-minded pursuit of economic growth. Which indicators are the most suitable replacements for, or most suitable enhancements to, G.D.P. Should they measure educational attainment or employment? Should they account for carbon emissions or happiness?
Note: Which is more important, the economic prosperity of a people, or the well being and level of happiness?
Related Stories
Latest News
Key News Articles from Years Past
